Existentialism Vs Absurdism Vs Nihilism


Existentialism, Absurdism, and Nihilism are three philosophical theories that have gained immense popularity over the years. All three philosophies center around themes of meaninglessness, despair, and the futility of human existence. However, there are significant differences between the three theories. In this article, we will explore what sets these philosophical theories apart and compare their ideologies.

Existentialism

Existentialism is a philosophy that emphasizes the existence of the human individual as being subject to what Jean-Paul Sartre called the “human condition.” It is a philosophy that deals with the human predicament, the individual’s search for meaning, purpose, and identity in a world that is devoid of inherent meaning.

In existentialism, humans are considered to be free and autonomous beings capable of shaping their own destiny, despite the absence of external meaning. The philosophy argues that even in a world where life seems meaningless, individuals have the power to make their lives meaningful through their choices and actions.

Existentialism encourages individuals to embrace their freedom and take responsibility for their lives. The philosophy emphasizes that even though life may be inherently meaningless, individuals still have the ability to create meaning by committing to values, goals, and causes. Thus, existentialism sees meaning as something that is constructed, and not something that is given.

Absurdism

Absurdism is a philosophy that was developed by the French-Algerian philosopher Albert Camus. Unlike existentialism, which emphasizes human freedom and ability to create meaning, absurdism suggests that life is entirely meaningless and that human efforts to find meaning are futile. To make matters worse, absurdism holds that human beings exist in a world that is inherently irrational and chaotic.

According to absurdism, the human search for meaning is an absurd endeavor, given that there is no meaning to be found. Rather than attempt to create meaning, absurdism suggests that individuals should embrace the absurdity of existence and find pleasure in the present moment. Absurdism emphasizes that the human condition is characterized by a sense of dislocation, disappointment, and dissatisfaction. However, it advises that individuals should embrace this condition and find happiness in the present moment.

Nihilism

Nihilism is a philosophy that posits the belief that life is entirely meaningless, and that there is no inherent value in anything. Nihilism emphasizes that human existence lacks any objective meaning or value. As such, nihilism emphasizes the rejection of all moral and religious principles, as they are deemed to be meaningless.

In nihilism, life is considered to be devoid of any purpose or value. The philosophy encourages individuals to repudiate all previous beliefs, values, and norms, and create new ones. Unlike existentialism, which views human autonomy as positive, nihilism suggests that the absence of meaning renders human life entirely meaningless.

Comparing Existentialism, Absurdism, and Nihilism

While existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism all deal with the question of existence and meaning, there are significant differences between the three philosophies. These differences are outlined below:

1. Meaning and Purpose

Existentialism suggests that while life may be devoid of meaning, individuals have the power to create meaning and purpose through their choices and actions. Absurdism, on the other hand, suggests that life is entirely meaningless, and individual attempts to find meaning are futile. Nihilism takes the view that life has no inherent meaning or purpose at all.

2. Human Freedom

Existentialism emphasizes individual freedom and autonomy, encouraging people to embrace their freedom and take responsibility for their lives. Absurdism suggests that the human condition is characterized by a sense of dislocation, disappointment, and dissatisfaction. However, it advises individuals to embrace this condition and find happiness in the present moment. Nihilism, meanwhile, suggests that the absence of meaning renders human life entirely meaningless.

3. Moral and Religious Principles

Existentialism does not reject moral or religious principles outright. Instead, it suggests that individuals should examine these principles critically and create their own values and beliefs. Absurdism views moral and religious principles as meaningless, while nihilism outright rejects them.

FAQs

1. What is the difference between existentialism and nihilism?

Existentialism suggests that while life may be devoid of meaning, individuals have the power to create meaning and purpose through their choices and actions. Nihilism, on the other hand, takes the view that life has no inherent meaning or purpose at all.

2. What is the difference between absurdism and nihilism?

Absurdism suggests that life is entirely meaningless and that human efforts to find meaning are futile. Nihilism, on the other hand, emphasizes the rejection of all moral and religious principles, as they are deemed to be meaningless.

3. Why is existentialism important?

Existentialism encourages individuals to embrace their freedom and take responsibility for their lives. The philosophy emphasizes that individuals have the power to create meaning and purpose in their lives, even in the absence of external meaning.

Conclusion

Existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism are three philosophical theories that deal with the question of existence and meaning. While there are similarities between the three philosophies, there are also significant differences. Existentialism emphasizes individual freedom and agency, encouraging people to create meaning and purpose in their lives. Absurdism views life as entirely meaningless and suggests that individuals should embrace the absurdity of existence, while nihilism rejects all moral and religious principles and asserts that life has no inherent meaning or value. Ultimately, the choice of which philosophical theory to embrace is a personal one that individuals must make for themselves.