5 11 Vs 6 0

When it comes to choosing the right height for a person, it can be more of an issue when it comes to specific professions. One of the most important professions that height can play a role in is in law enforcement or military service. This is why the debate between 5’11 vs. 6’0 as the ideal height for these individuals has been ongoing.

There are pros and cons to each height, and it is important to understand them before making any decisions. In this article, we will explore the differences between 5’11 and 6’0, and discuss some of the most frequently asked questions about these heights.

Height and Law Enforcement

Height in law enforcement and military service has been a subject of discussion for a long time. There is a common notion that taller people are better suited for these jobs, as they can intimidate suspects and handle physical combat more effectively. This belief led to minimum height requirements for these professions. However, as physical requirements have changed, these mandates have also changed.

The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) outlines law enforcement fitness standards that focus on physical abilities, rather than height requirement. This includes physical strength, endurance, and agility. Thus, while height may have some effect on officer performance, it is not as important as physical fitness.

Here are some of the pros and cons of 5’11 vs. 6’0 and how they can affect law enforcement and military service.

Pros and Cons of 5’11


1. More agile: 5’11 individuals are more agile than their taller counterparts. They can move faster and in tighter spaces, which can be helpful in combat situations.

2. More common: 5’11 is a more common height, which means that they can blend into crowds better. This can be a useful tool for undercover operations, as the individual is less noticeable.


1. Less intimidating: 5’11 is not as intimidating as its taller counterpart. If an individual is needed to diffuse a situation with a suspect, they may not be as effective as a taller person.

2. Less likely to be recruited: This is especially true for military service. Taller people may be preferred during recruitment, as they can handle physical tasks more efficiently.

Pros and Cons of 6’0


1. More intimidating: 6’0 individuals are generally more intimidating than those who are 5’11. They can make a more significant impression on a suspect and may be better at diffusing situations.

2. Better for physical tasks: because of their height, they may be capable of handling more challenging physical tasks.


1. Less agile: 6’0 individuals may not be as agile as their 5’11 counterparts. This means they may struggle in tight spaces or quick movements.

2. More noticeable: Because 6’0 is taller, they are more noticeable in crowds. This makes them less effective for undercover operations.


Q: Is being taller better for law enforcement or military jobs?

A: Studies have shown that physical fitness is more important than height in these professions. However, being tall can be an advantage in certain situations, such as making an impression on suspects.

Q: Can 5’11 individuals still qualify for law enforcement or military positions?

A: Yes, as long as they pass the required physical fitness tests, height is not a disqualifying factor.

Q: Is there a significant difference between 5’11 and 6’0?

A: The difference in height may not be significant, but it can affect job performance in specific situations.

Q: Is 6’0 always preferred for law enforcement and military jobs?

A: No, there are pros and cons to both heights, and it depends on the situation. Taller individuals may be preferred for physical tasks, but less agile in certain situations.


Choosing between 5’11 vs. 6’0 for law enforcement or military service is not an easy decision. Both heights have advantages and disadvantages. A person’s physical fitness is ultimately more important than height for these jobs. While taller individuals may have some advantages in some situations, the difference in height may not be significant enough to make a difference in performance. It is essential to focus on physical fitness as the primary factor in determining the right candidate for law enforcement or military positions.